The ceiling is likely not where you thought it was.
Your team already optimized that hot path. You reached for the library everyone trusts and assumed that was as fast as it gets. Most teams are further from the limit than they think — and we can show you, on your code, exactly how much room is left.

We take a performance-critical path, map it to your hardware target, and push everything that can move to compile time and initialization time. What remains is an algorithm shaped to the silicon. The benchmark is the proof — reproducible, cross-compiler, on your machine.

Proof, Not Promises

We don't ask you to take performance claims on faith — we hand you the harness that proves them. See void-numerics, our open-source integer-conversion library: faster than std across Linux, macOS, and Windows on Clang, GCC, and MSVC, exhaustively tested against the standard, and registered on the Microsoft vcpkg registry.

Every benchmark on that page is fetched live from the repository — including the cases where std wins. That is the standard we hold our consulting work to.

See the benchmarks →

How It Works

Step 01

Codebase Review

Send us the hot paths. We profile them, map them to your hardware target, and identify exactly where you're leaving performance on the table — with a concrete, quantified estimate of the gap.

Step 02

Implementation

We close the gap on a branch you review and merge, held to your existing test suite — every test green in your CI, with new coverage for new code. Your tests are the contract.

Step 03

Proof Delivered

You get the branch and the benchmark harness behind it: behavior verified by your tests, speed verified by reproducible measurement on your hardware.

You give us read access to the code and its tests; once we agree on a win worth making, we scope it against the measured gain and implement. Where a hot path is thinly covered, characterization tests come first — there's no optimizing what isn't pinned down.

Even when a review finds your hot path is already near-optimal, that is a real, billable finding: a documented, benchmarked confirmation that the ceiling is where you thought it was — and where the remaining room actually is.

Scope & Pricing

A Codebase Review is a fixed-fee engagement: you get a profiled, hardware-mapped report on where the performance is hiding and a quantified estimate of the gap. It stands on its own — no obligation to proceed.

Implementation is scoped per project against the measured win identified in the review, so the work is sized to the value before it starts. Tell us the hot path and the hardware, and we'll come back with a concrete scope and figure.

Who This Is For

Teams with C++ systems hitting a performance ceiling on a hot path.
Engineers who already tried the obvious wins and reached for the trusted library.
Anyone who suspects "this is as fast as it gets" is a question, not an answer.